Not signed in (Sign In)
Back To Bastardly! | Sexy Tanktop | Bastardly Interviews
Bastardly Travels | Archives | Contact | Copyright | About

Vanilla 1.1.4 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.


All Things Sexy, Hot & Wild!: ERIN ANDREWS NUDE

Bottom of Page

1 to 11 of 11

  1.  
    • CommentAuthorRazer Rick
    • CommentTimeJul 18th 2009 edited
     
    Erin Andrews nude hotel room peephole video...Hard to find !

    Some of you might have seen it already or a different version. It was pulled on NSFW POA (original site with it on). This was another site I found it on. Very short and quality isn't too great.

    Fuck it here is one of the links : http://www.megaupload.com/?d=DSGS19C9

    *Also go to pornbb.org and search "ESPN"
    • CommentAuthorglimmer
    • CommentTimeJul 19th 2009
     
    it's cool, edit whenever you'd like. :)
  3.  
    who the fuck is erin andrews and why should i care?
  4.  
    Blue,

    Erin Andrews is a Sportcaster for ESPN. She has been the object of lust for a few years by many a guy who watches that channel. Apparently, a video was taking of her through a peephole while she was staying at a hotel. She is naked just moving around the room putting on makeup, doing her hair, etc etc. The video is of terrible quality, if ESPN and her rep, hadnt gone on a crusade trying to get the video removed this last weekend, no one would of known for sure it was her. The quality is so bad, she could of easily denied it and most people would of believed her.


    Hell the quality is so bad, it isnt even worth rubbing one out watching it no matter who you believe it is of.


    I hope that was helpful Blue.
  5.  
    yes... i still dont know who she is (meaning never saw her on TV) but i dont watch ESPN all that much.

    next time im flipping around ill see if i find her doing a report or something.

    and seriously thank you, sometimes im too lazy to google the name and wiki and see myself LOL
  6.  
    Yeah no problem for providing the info.

    I guess I should of also added she "won" the title of "sexiest sportscaster" from Playboy in '07 and '08.

    Anyways not her wikipedia entry, but this has some pictures of her so you can see what all the fuss is about (clothed pics).
    • CommentAuthorRazer Rick
    • CommentTimeJul 21st 2009
     
    I tell you what, I think it is all a big scam. I mean come on, why was she completely naked doing her hair while simultaneously doing squats? If she was going to an event where she would put on a dress, I would understand not wearing a bra, but why no underwear?

    Also, her actions looked as if she was playing to the camera, with the squats and shit, like that crap where they take girls to abandoned beaches and videotape them as if they were at a nude beach even though you and they know the camera is staring straight at them?!

    747-21-2009 @ 2:15AM

    razrrick13 said...
    Yeah, I know. I bet you nobody knew anything about the video when it was posted on thursday and removed.

    But come Saturday and Sunday, it was all over the damn place. AOL, MSN, where ever, they all had it. Plus it seemed odd how the camera had a perfect angle...

    Her actions were very voyeuristic as well. Doing your hair naked while simultaneousley doing squats? WTF?


    sorry, just my take.
    • CommentAuthorRazer Rick
    • CommentTimeJul 21st 2009
     
    Plus did anyone else notice the timing was perfect right when the ESPY's were about to air ?
  9.  
    Actually Rick that video has been up since April, but it wasnt identified as belonging to Erin until last week.

    She might be doing the squats so she can see herself better in the mirror, I know that at some hotels, If I want to see the top of my head in some of their mirrors I have to squat down a bit.

    As to the totally nude while getting ready thing, well I have had some GF's who do all their makeup/primp in the nude, and some who dont.

    Not totally disagreeing with you that it might all been staged, etc etc. Just not convinced either way tbh, so playing the devils advocate.
    • CommentAuthorglimmer
    • CommentTimeJul 22nd 2009
     
    this popped up at deadspin...

    The first time I ever wrote about Erin Andrews on Deadspin was August 22, 2006. The site was nearly a year old by then.

    In the wake of the awful video that hit the Web over the weekend — actually, it had been hanging around for months, apparently, but no one had seen it — everyone is pointing fingers. It's blogs' fault for objectifying her. It's fans' fault for often caring more about what happens off the field than on. It's ESPN's fault for not strangling this story in the crib when they had the chance. (And they did.) It's her fault. It's our sports culture's fault. It's the fault of the thin walls of a lousy hotel.

    None of these things are true, of course, and all of them are. Obviously, the fault lies in the assbag who shot the video in the first place, something this person has made a habit of, ultimately stumbling on someone in the public arena. (Let there be no doubt, though: This could happen to you, your wife, your girlfriend, your daughter. These slugs exist because it's impossible to find a way to kill them all.)

    But it's more than that, obviously. That's the reason we're all here and talking about it, aren't we? This is not just any sideline reporter snoop video. It's Erin Andrews. If this is Holly Rowe, or Jill Arrington, or Michele Tafoya, this story is over in a day, if it even goes that far. But it wasn't. It was Erin Andrews. She was not called America's Sideline Sex Object: She was called America's Sideline Princess. Lisa Guerrero posed for Playboy. Jamie Little models when she's not updating us on NASCAR. Andrews was never like that. She was a sideline reporter, and a busy one, sloughing through West Lafayette and regularly traveling with Brent Musburger. It would have been shocking to see her do so much as a photo shoot.

    But that doesn't really matter, does it? It's not like Jamie Little or Lisa Guerrero would deserve a snoop cam video any more than Erin Andrews did. No, the reason the video has gained such traction, and the reason everyone is so upset — and I can assure you, I've yet to talk to a single person, blogger, blog reader, ESPN employee, sideline reporter, upright walking normal human being, who wasn't profoundly disturbed by this — is because we all felt somewhat complicit with Andrews. Everyone felt like they knew her. They didn't, of course. But everyone with an interest in the world of sports was present for her rise. When the stills from the video hit the New York Post this morning, it is very likely that 95 percent of their readership were seeing her name for the first time. (Suddenly, Nick Denton cares about sports!) It's all out of everybody's hands now. The toothpaste is out of the tube.

    That's the thing: This is awful for anyone who has ever written or said anything about Erin Andrews, ever. Everything seemed innocent before, which is why everybody did it. Sports Media Watch has an excellent long post detailing what brought us to this point, pointing out comments about Andrews made by newspaper folk, bloggers, broadcasters and whatever Bruce Pearl is. But Sports Media Watch overstates it: It somehow tries to tie all that to the video, saying the Andrews talk created a "hostile environment." From my experience, the environment was anything but "hostile." Its lack of hostility always seemed like the point.

    But it's all just kind of dissembling now, isn't it? People who took photos of themselves smiling with Andrews on the sideline feel guilty, ESPN feels guilty, bloggers feel guilty, everybody feels guilty except the scumbag who shot the video in the first place. (I am ascribing this person with the inability to feel empathy.) The whole thing went wrong, very wrong. I do not think there is direct causality here ... at all. But it's not so wakka-wakka all-in-fun anymore, isn't it? Even if we all feel comfortable that we were above board, if we scoffed at those other sites who were cruder and uglier, that part is over. No one feels good about it.

    Just to check myself on this, I went back and read every post I ever wrote about Andrews. The first was about a reader chiming in to say Eric Karros had made a strange comment about Andrews — it turned out to be Orel Hershiser — and contained the line "we still have sympathy for the Erin Andrews of the world, if just because no matter what they do, no matter where they are, no matter how much work they might put in ... to their male colleagues, they're pretty much still just a skirt," which is something I still think is probably true. Later, an interview with her from CSTV, Andrews' tips on where to eat in Atlanta, Pat White saying he "almost fainted" when she walked up to him and her relenting to a blog interview in which she called Deadspin "hysterical," swoon swoon, blah blah, god it all feels so gross now. I dunno: It felt like she was in on the joke, you know? Maybe she was. Doesn't matter now. (Make sure to read the comments on that story, by the way. When commenters learned that Andrews might read Deadspin, they were downright respectful. One commenter even joked about having to comb his hair and put on a tie.)

    Was I ever over the line? Was Bruce Pearl when he hugged her? Was Rick Sutcliffe when he constantly commented on her dress? Was ESPN, and sports media in general, when they realized that attractive women on the sideline helped ratings? Did I contribute to this awful thing that happened? Did all of us? I don't think so. I really don't.

    But. I have never met Erin Andrews. If I ran into her on the street today ... I'm not sure I could look her in the eye. I'm not sure anybody could.

    since the stuff in their comments sections is always interesting/head over there..
  11.  
    i saw stills in the newspaper this AM...

    they had from the video and a picture of her... and i couldnt agree more with....

    . The video is of terrible quality, if ESPN and her rep, hadnt gone on a crusade trying to get the video removed this last weekend, no one would of known for sure it was her. The quality is so bad, she could of easily denied it and most people would of believed her.

    that video is so shitty. its like someone used a cell phone through a door peephole.

1 to 11 of 11

  1.  
Add your comments
    Username Password
  • Format comments as
 
Back to Discussions Top of Page